Obama lies – about everything you say, "Check it Out!

Stop the cover and the vote of Commerce - Now the United States Senate. CALL YOUR Senator now.

Cap and Trade fraudulently sold

attention Obama's health is bad – the administration does not want you to focus on what really is happening. If everyone focuses on propaganda charges by ABC – which will not realize that Cap and Trade is stuck in the throat. Now, with the debacle Governor Sanford, you can bet that from the White House hailed another distraction taking the eyes of Cap & Trade.

The legislation of 1500 the climate of the top cap and trade, also known as the Bill Waxman-Markey, approved by a narrow margin at the end of June 26 Members of Congress added 300 pages of the early morning vote. It is safe to assume that almost none of the 435 members of Congress read the entire bill, which means one of the most expensive bills in U.S. history was carried out by both politicians could benefit from its July 4 recess.
Cap and trade is a massive energy tax, which explains why the alternative is a carbon tax, and was sold under false pretenses the following:
* It costs nothing;
* It will increase employment;
* Green investment will increase, and
* You save the environment.

More than a bell one days

A cost estimate often cited comes from Waxman-Markey Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which states that the CAP and trade will cost the equivalent of a postage stamp per day – $ 175 per household in 2020 [1].
But CBO ignores the real economic costs such as loss of gross domestic product (GDP) as a result of the bill [2] and the fact that consumers and businesses will change their behavior due to high energy prices. This is a serious shortcoming which has consequences for economic consequences.
In the economic analysis Heritage Foundation, the Waxman-Markey legislation on climate change, loss of GDP in 2020 was 161 billion dollars (in 2009 dollars). [3] For a family of four, which translates into $ 1,870 – more than 10 times the size of the CBO claim.Furthermore $ 175, Heritage analysis shows that every year, the average loss of GDP was 393 billion dollars, more than double the loss in 2020. In 2035 (latest year analyzed by heritage), the loss of GDP inflation-adjusted $ 6,790 to work for a family of four.
energy-intensive industries will also suffer significant losses. For example, agriculture is very energy intensive, fuel, electricity, chemicals, fertilizer costs, and from the PAC and the automotive sector the cost price energy losses of farmers, certainly greater than any money we get from the compensation (money the companies pay farmers to reduce carbon emissions from agriculture or not to use more efficient technologies). Heritage Foundation Center for Data Analysis found that income agriculture (or the amount left after paying all costs) would be reduced by $ 8 billion in 2012, $ 25 million in 2024, and more than 50 million dollars in 2035. These decreases were 28 percent, 60 percent and 94 percent respectively. The average net income lost over the chronology 2010-2035 is 23 000 million – a decline of 57 percent of the base.

This a bill that destroy jobs

President Obama and the leaders House Democrats argued that the Waxman-Markey is a draft law jobs. With subsidies for green investments placed in the sumptuous bill, probably businesses to hire workers to build solar panels and windmills, but the number of green jobs will be nothing compared to the number of jobs lost due to high energy prices and slowing economic growth.
The purpose of the cap and trade is to raise energy costs for people use less. Since almost all companies use energy to produce goods and must pay their own bills, the cost of production of companies increases, and decreased consumer demand for two reasons:
1. The price increases in goods to reduce demand and
2. People have less disposable income due to energy prices.
In general, production cuts and lower consumer spending to destroy jobs and slow economic growth, where Unemployment continues to rise.
The Heritage analysis found that in the 2012-2035 calendar, job losses averaged more than 1.1 million dollars. In 2035, 2.5 million jobs expected to be lost below the baseline – not the cap and trade bill. [4] Some jobs will be lost completely, while others will move to different countries where production costs are cheaper. Again, these losses are above jobs "Green", created as a result of the bill.

Renewable Energy Less

The final draft of the House of many renewable energy investments in an effort to attract votes. The Waxman-Markey proposal still requires more electricity from renewable sources, he said, mainly for energy Wind others, but also as biomass and solar. Ironically, according to a bill analysis by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) project Waxman-Markey bill will actually result in less renewable energy without the bill because of lower overall power consumption [5].
Green projects will pay not for themselves, are the taxpayers who fund research and development of renewable energy and the cost of subsidies that are required for energy competitive renewable. However, renewable energy still provides only a small fraction of the energy needs of America and are the sources more expensive per kilowatt-hour of traditional and reliable energy. Consumers lose twice, giving more as taxpayers and as taxpayers.

Not going to save the planet

The supposed advantage of cap and trade is that regulation will reduce emissions of carbon dioxide enough to stop warming and reduce overall global temperatures.
According to climatologist Chip Knappenberger, Waxman-Markey temperatures are moderated by hundredths of a degree in 2050 and no more than two tenths of a degree at the end of the century [6]. Even EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson agreed, saying recently: "I think the central parts of the list [EPA] are that U.S. action will not affect the levels of CO2 in the world. [7]
A multilateral approach would be much better. In the case of international cooperation India, China and the rest of the developing world will return to their 2000 levels of CO2 emissions by 2050. On a per capita basis, China to a tenth of what States United States issued in 2000. India and most developing countries fall to levels even lower. This scenario, in addition to being very unlikely, would be to develop the world the developing world.

Go ahead

Now that the bill passed the House of Representatives U.S. probably will move to the U.S. Senate this fall. It is important to remember that policy makers have promised any bill actually do the opposite. Cap and trade will raise energy costs in the coming years, resulting in economic pain and increased unemployment. All these points are equally important, if not Moreover, in the debate in the Senate.

Stop cap and trade to vote now in the United States Senate or CALL 1-212-224-3121 http://www.usa.gov/ Email, fax, local phone calls Governor of the State see website for details.
Stop the Senate vote NOW!

About the Author

OBAMA’S LIES
Obama and his lying team is telling the people exactly what they want to hear. The people are getting half-truths or down right lies after they tell them what they want to here.

The Globalists’ Agenda – New World Order Quotes from Politicians (1950 – 2009) Part 3