barack obama race issues

Frankly, We Need More than a Race Discussion

Barack Obama’s attorney general Eric Holder has decided the whole unity thing is overrated. Last week in front of Justice Department employees he called out Americans for being racial cowards

“Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards,” said Holder, nation’s first black attorney general.

Race issues continue to be a topic of political discussion, Holder said, but “we, as average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race.”

“It is an issue we have never been at ease with and, given our nation’s history, this is in some ways understandable,” Holder said. “If we are to make progress in this area, we must feel comfortable enough with one another and tolerant enough of each other to have frank conversations about the racial matters that continue to divide us.”

Vanderbilt Torch writer Mike Warren rightly takes issue with Eric Holder’s assertion that we people are afraid of discussing race, primarily because, well – we discuss it all the time

“At a university, where discussion is a critical tool for learning, I think it’s good to at least talk about these things. But the conversation is stitled, predictable, and really not too free. I am pretty outspoken about several issues in class, but I don’t exactly rattle off the numbers on the rise in black crime and its correlation with the rise in black single motherhood without being extremely measured.

The point is that we talk about race all the time; some professors believe it informs a lot more than it probably does. The plain meaning could not be clearer – talk, which we have had legions of over the last four decades, must become a permanent one-way street, where government plays the role of collective caretaker!).”

Of course, Mike is still at Vanderbilt, and I haven’t been in a Vanderbilt classroom in a nearly a decade. However, I do recall no shortage of discussions of race in the pertinent class setting (I do go on record hoping race never comes up in, say, calculus). If there is a problem to be addressed, it is certainly not a lack of discussion.

Indeed, let us address the real problem. I say we need to stop being cowards in discussing Eric Holder’s comments. Let us move toward a more relevant discussion, and dissect the difference between what Holder said and what he meant. If you take Holder’s words as spoken, they hold little, if any, real meaning.

Let us begin discussing what a “frank discussion” actually means. He isn’t talking about “talk”. If you don’t think we talk race, or talked race during the latest and longest presidential campaign in history, I cannot help you. If we take Holder’s words at face value, we will always be racial cowards because there is never going to be enough time to talk. Talk is cheap and ineffective when seeking real incentive and societal reform.

And that is just it – this was a clarion call for more race pandering, not a broader race discussion. We already have race discussion, but when it is “frank”, it just does not seem to be well-received. Certainly, Eric Holder remembers what happened to Bill Cosby when he dared mention the real problems in minority communities. Unlike a century ago, white oppression can no longer be deemed the cause for black poverty. Growing single motherhood, higher male incarceration rates, and the growing masses of ignorant, uneducated young people are the plague of urban America.

Indeed, the only way we can truly address the root causes of this ongoing urban societal disaster flick is by getting to frank discussions that move past race. The aforementioned problems began to accelerate after World War II, and have gotten even worse as racial issues have been materially addressed. In fact, the urban areas that have seen the most societal breakdown along with the surrounding white suburbs are the populations who voted overwhelmingly for Barack Obama and propelled the first black president into the White House.

Something is certainly amiss with our black urban populations, but it is not a frank discussion about race that we need. A more legitimate approach is required.

Why has Clinton vs Barack Obama come down to ‘black votes’. Is this white female vs black man? or policy?

I notice in the American press there is alot of emphasis on Barack Obama trying to get the ‘black votes’. Sounds to me like this has become a ‘race election. Black man vs white woman. We all know who has historically always won that little battle. Why has this thing become a race issue at all? Surely policy is important to the most powerful country in the world. Or, has it now become so theatrical that really it doesn’t matter because the seat of power is elsewhere? If it is the case that it doesn’t matter, then it would figure that ‘before a black man’ becomes president, ‘a white woman’ should get the job. The actual important stuff and decisions will be made behind the scenes regardless of who is in the hot seat.

The media has way too much influence. It’s really hard to dig through all the hype, like the race/gender issue, to get to the real issues. We all know it’s not that simple.

Michael Eric Dyson: Obama avoiding race issues