canadian political parties spectrum

guilty conscience?

White, stupid and with a sense of unjustified racial superiority and the right

by Stanley Collymore

Try to imagine that one is forced to live in a community where the local authority is not elected You have the power democratically through the ballot box, or even a motion for change of this body and it's really a non-elected and not accountable to you and the rest of their community, namely Quango. And while you get your head around that also imagine that this Quango mentioned can do what you want on your daily life, including the collection of exorbitant amounts of money to fulfill its arbitrary harmful programs self-obsessed and uncompromising are not consulted, no type of knowledge or respect for your point of view, even when not express, despise you, he knows he can hold the account that you have no right of veto or even the power of memory on its members, and whose activities are not only benefits that you or other members of your community who are paying for all this, but Although the circle of his own convenience, fundamentally incompetent, nepotism Quango members and privileged body of family members, like-minded friends and associates and, most important and, ironically, some who live beyond the borders of their community, and even in foreign countries, whose national interests and not external are in disagreement, but are contrary their own community who are not crazy, but the Quango it can not be defeated in obedience to a compensation of success.

Unimaginable evil or fantasy, perhaps? Sorry, but this is not because it is very much a reality in the United Kingdom and the body semi-autonomous government I mean, none other than the BBC, or by their official name (a name error if one exists): The British Broadcasting Corporation as single precision parts of the title refers only to the fact that it is an entity that issues and so Great Britain. For the BBC is neither a business in the true sense of the word nor the British in the sense of the terminology means an entity that adheres accurately and consistently supports and promotes the values that are typically British and universally understood and accepted as such.

To start The myth widely publicized by the BBC as an impartial broadcaster is exactly that. And to reinforce this reality to say that the BBC has always been the spokesperson Mandarins of the rich and privileged, Downing Street and Whitehall policy selectively designate members of their board of directors and CEO, and as expected, are not only accountable, but are also deeply corrupt and integrated into the pockets of the plutocrats large financial firms, many of them closely linked to the oil and armaments, experienced and longstanding connections with foreign countries that the United States, Israel and western states of the customer in the Middle East, the powerful Zionist organizations like AIPAC and other U.S. and Canadian hybrids than counterparts in the United Kingdom, the European Union and the United States as white settlers of Australia and New Zealand, and to make matters worse, these powerful interests through government legislation for the common man and woman in the street to finance their virulent propaganda, which is generally very hostile to the general interests of the tellers of the man who fund the BBC.

How democratic! How patriotic puppeteers external and internal to the BBC, taking into account that, regardless if you look at the BBC or not, if he or she lives in the United Kingdom and the purchase of a TV that the individual must pay an annual fee of televisions, a policy to comply strictly with the prosecution and punishment must be radically the principle or out of ignorance or inability to pay does not meet what is essentially the canon law of the land. This, despite a current of opinion in the United Kingdom that while most Britons prefer the BBC as a broadcasting company in the public sector keyword of his thought is public. But the BBC continues the Zionist program in conjunction with private sector organizations such as Sky, ITV, CNN, Fox News media and other right-wing press and electronic call Western public. How can this be, and why the BBC has come out with it? In my case that the independent media in commercial society democratic, if not break the law, it is not my concern, I think about freedom of expression and at least have the courage out and control the advertising and put their money where their mouths are. The BBC is different, however, his money comes from Canon does the payer treats him with contempt, and the BBC to follow the line of sky and the rest of them I personally, and I'm sure many others subject to the fee should feel like I could not care less what the rage, nepotism and the Zionist cohorts who run it. But while the BBC holds as it does at the same time achieving Money for old rope I think my point of view and many others like me are very applicable.

Stephen Lendman is a partner Research Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net . In a brilliant article entitled: Pro-Israel bias of the BBC, he hits the nail right on the head from the BBC and how It conducts its work of propaganda, turn into the time that this long-standing flagship of probity, integrity and impartiality – something that is Certainly not. Rense.com in an incisive and detailed account by Thomas Sparks, entitled: "Close to Total Jewish Zionist Control of the British press – May 2002 – sets out how all the independent media and the BBC are the property of, or if the BBC is controlled by a small circle of ardent Zionists, which are often related by blood or marriage to another, in some cases have been appointed members of the Israeli Defence Force, regular visits Israel, have close ties with their leaders, and whose first loyalty is not in the United Kingdom, but Israel itself. Not surprisingly there is a pro-Israeli bias in favor of virulent what Israel does, no matter how heinous their crimes are, or are committed against or.

It was the same during apartheid in South Africa with the BBC, in many cases is the spokesperson for domestic and international odious that country, the racist regime and their apologists and supporters warring fans in the United Kingdom, and managing to do so with great success thanks to the trust many monitors in place because of his longevity as a broadcaster BBC International. Who can forget Margaret Thatcher have the arrogance: "Whoever think that the ANC will never be the government of South Africa living in Cloud Cuckoo Land! "The BBC and supported widely adopted this mindset of racism that deliberately refused to enlighten his listeners and viewers about whether financial firms were massive and very other than profit and Maggie and their goals, "lamented husband Denis was, like many others of his ilk, who practices apartheid South Africa and a committed and happily do so on the back and the work of oppressed prices indigenous South Africans had no vote, no say in managing their own country and whose life in all aspects were controlled by white racists expatriates as their ancestors had done previously in most of the world at the time of slavery and European colonialism entrenched.

It is in this context, therefore, that the night of Tuesday, June 8, 2010, in line with the BBC to watch a documentary Leonora Critchlow raises the question: Who is Nelson Mandela? A former members of the anti-apartheid myself when this movement was considered a pariah by many organization in the United Kingdom and have been Regular guests of the Tory party conference "Hang Mandela" and said many luminaries from across the political spectrum in Britain and in the halls of the United Kingdom national convictions were Nelson Mandela as a terrorist and the ANC as a terrorist organization – now the same epithet as the leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah and their organizations and even leaders of Turkey, Brazil, Iran, Venezuela and Bolivia in the white supremacist intellectual – and well versed in African affairs, I sat waiting for the worst, the same way that you feel obliged to attend a family wedding, but he knows instinctively feels that the main speaker, even embarrass you to everyone for a fool himself, while asininely think he or she is very Smart.

To my surprise, I was surprised to see a documentary What largely balanced, it has been especially from the BBC barn, and at the same time as a journalist myself qualified and experienced a number of questions I would have raised relevant and the answers I would have done more, given that it was the BBC which was presented to, and replacing me with my hat journalist with a university (to be a professional in higher education for decades) would be Ms. Critchlow, who is black / white marriages mixed with a B + for the company. However, what interested me most, and immediately I turned my attention towards the end of the documentary, were the Public comments on the blog of Ms. Critchlow, and have in turn prompted me to write this piece, knowing full well that had been sent to the BBC that Appeal moderators can not be said that never saw the light of day.

As expected, there were mixed reactions the documentary and I read with interest by me but as expected, a hardened militant, some really made my blood boil, and a reply as it was from someone who calls himself AMALINDA. Then is my response to Amalinda and as she led me to write this article: "White, stupid and with a sense of racial superiority and wrongful law. "Now I am openly that gives you the opportunity to express solidarity and is attenuated by all South Africans impartial, regardless of their race or social, and fans like me, like they want to see them live in peace, harmony and a society that offers equal opportunities to all and where the character of the person and not their skin color issues, or in accordance with my statement and have the courage to say objectively why. Here's the challenge I Amalinda et al.

Amalinda, and their peers would like everyone to believe that apartheid in Africa South is a political and social panacea continued that way if it were not for blacks boring they wanted to spoil things: how to manage their own country, get the vote to go to school and get a decent education that allows them to live where I wanted in their own country, be treated as human beings in their own country, etc., etc. – all things white as Amalinda take for granted and feel they have a sense of entitlement to the all-powerful.

I am not surprised that she sides with the South African youth in the documentary. What is it, women Boer and their peers do not realize or accept is that it is Africa. And whenever such open his mouth to order the black, the first thing I always tell them, no matter where the blacks were born, grew up, live, work or in what countries pay their taxes, if outside of Africa is: "Why not go back to Africa where you belong? Well, I have news for you Amalinda and others like you, South Africa is in Africa.

It is significant that even Leonora Critchlow did not ask for this woman who claims Boers Boers that are now second class citizens class in South Africa: "What were the blacks before the official dismantling of apartheid? At least in the post-apartheid white South African can vote, blacks are not a luxury under apartheid, the whites can live where they want blacks could not under apartheid, and most of them still can not be 16 years after its dissolution, because of the disparity wealth between whites, who were allowed to retain profits after apartheid bad acquired and stigmatized blacks and significantly disadvantaged by apartheid itself, therefore, all these municipalities to be known simply custodians of labor good black and placed where they are for the work was easy on the tap for the exclusive benefit of whites.

The second-class citizens white South Africa? Those who believe this are totally intolerant or simply have a laugh. Most of the wealth in South Africa in terms of money and land there, over 90% more arable land in the hands of whites through ethnic cleansing, forcible transfer and pure barbarism against Black Indians took this land from them and despite the official dismantling of apartheid in South Africa is still clinging stubbornly to it, and never have the land paid a penny, as is the case of Zimbabwe. In fact, one of the biggest complaints by blacks in Africa, and not just confined to southern Africa, is that blacks, unlike Europeans in Europe, do not own their land or country. And for those who require the absurd and paternalistic and racial bias question: "Why so many people leaving South Africa? "Let me clarify the issue here.

First, policies and immigration laws of European states, particularly the EU, U.S. and outposts of white settlers in Australia, New Zealand and Canada Black immigration to these countries is severely restricted or, in many cases virtually zero. So if there are people who leave South Africa to go to the land belonging to white and white-checked these immigrants should be white. And that is precisely what happens, because each – were born outside South Africa or in the country – to give birth were born in Europe, USA, Canada, Australia or New Zealand passports that allow them to reside and work freely in these countries, without obstacles, which operated well, just look at the composition of English cricket team, with its plethora of white players in South Africa and who can forget the cynical use of a British passport by Zola Budd run for the United Kingdom, but also to circumvent the sanctions imposed after South Africa ended apartheid, in fact, for the reasons above married, damage black victims not to leave South Africa or who have been accepted in this country of white-owned and controlled, even if they could. So let's cut the trash whites in South Africa to be second class citizens.

And for the stupid comment that Europe is a continent of different cultures, how gross! Show me one country in Europe to be directed by someone other than white! Show me a country European whose government other than white! Show me a country in Europe, where from now or formerly a non-white minority dominated, especially the kind influence deadly than whites in South Africa have had on Blacks, since the colonized country. Show me a black state or other non-whites is now or has ever existed in Europe. Even Turkey, more than half of whose territory lies in Europe, was refused membership of the EU for many countries in Europe, especially Germany and France, for purely racist, which can not always see one of these European states and their citizens predominantly white countenancing always completely black or other non-whites on the European continent, or black or other non-whites want a state (Or states) that we believe, especially against the will of the white majority. But guess what? It is quite acceptable in the distorted thinking such a white racist to have a white state in Africa and sub-Saharan Africa.

The creation of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission for the post of ANC official fall of apartheid and the disappearance of the minority before and hateful, racist regime that took place in South Africa shows humanity endemic incredible maturity, magnanimity and eager significant aversion to blacks in general and the ANC government, in particular, the solution old accounts at any price, a human face, which is commendable, especially among Caucasians often lacking, especially their elected leaders, governments of all political tendencies, their main means of communication, business and public sector representatives at all levels, unions and others and which is transmitted by instinct down and quickly absorbed and inculcated by many members of the European population and their parents and friends of the white settlers established across the States World in Canada and the United States to Australia and New Zealand. Empathy that says he will not criticize or take action against crimes White terrible and inhuman treatment committed against blacks and other non-whites, but because the victims and their families and friends shocked by it as a desperate act to retaliate against the desperate acts of barbarism committed against them, while whites who collectively condemned and condemned as terrorists, dishonest pretend that we are fighting a war against terrorism and use it as our military and economic power to crush them unfairly.

We forget not underestimate or be deceived them about the importance of what the ANC has done in the creation of truth and reconciliation. No government white or anywhere in the body of Caucasians have done, especially in circumstances in which the ANC and the majority population of the South since so long has placed involuntarily. No Government in the White House or colonies has never done this before and it is difficult to see a white government acting always this way for the magnanimity and forgiveness to their enemies, in particular, another implacable and especially if they are black white or other adversaries is child's play for the white government, their media and the general public. Revenge is what they wanted, demanded and obtained the support of family and Kith the world began their celebration of reprisal.

Nuremberg were not an isolated example. History is replete with a multitude of other that have been reported and are unknown to the general public, and in general, even those courts generally have been carelessly when the terrorists themselves (freedom fighters of the shrewdest mind) are not white, Kenya and Malaysia during his fight for independence the British are just two examples of the British side, but all the white countries ruled the world is guilty. Nuremberg is said that only in that the court was mainly motivated by the guilt of white person, but in most cases have anti-Semitism inherent in white: a curse whose genesis is exclusively white European and white, to give full expression to his own holocaust in Europe, although other, more general holocausts and lasting was committed before and after the 1933-1945 white European and governments around the planet Earth. But these unfortunate victims: Vietnam, Congo, South and Central America and Africa, of white imperialism, colonialism and a mindset of superiority white were black or white and others do not, as such, his equally barbaric abuse, murder and disappearance did not matter circles in the Caucasus.

It is also important, this state is culturally Boer that this woman was and want to see materialize in black South African in Africa South are only going to have their citizens or other targets are allowed to become good citizens? And if it launches its right culturally false argument of Ball Park. After all, whites are not a homogeneous group of people in South Africa and who come from all cultural groups: Jews, for example, across Europe and are not themselves a homogeneous group, then there are the English, the French and other European languages, and above all, do not forget they Boer Dutch! Even in the Netherlands: a European state established and recognized, there are several groups white Caucasians living there as a nation. Obviously, all this Women's needs and desires of domination is white, and in this case, the continued dominance of white More Blacks who she clearly considered much lower himself and others like her, and therefore can not accept that in 2010 blacks who have suffered terribly from apartheid intolerant response to these days terrible, but she considered were the happy days of her ilk.

So my proposal is that, if Amalinda Boer women really want to live exclusively black, so all I want to highlight one striking fact these people: there is already a Boer state in this world who has a seat on the UN agencies represented in more people and is a full member of NATO nuclear weapons on its territory PLACED – called NETHERLANDS (Holland). Indeed, apartheid South Africa has been given and contributed to the development of its nuclear weapons program Zionist Israel and the West, but when it became a democratic state based on universal suffrage to adult citizens the same Western countries led by the United States, Great Britain and France have been harassing the democratic South Africa to renounce these weapons despite the ANC, who knew the nuclear agreement between the Zionist apartheid in South Africa and the West, said time under a democratic government that were in charge of his country would no weapons, and willingly give them up, but even with this solemn and clear commitment to democratic institutions of the West and the spirit as racist colonial governments spend in their own countries, to resolve to accept it.

Fast forward to Iran in 2010 and the message is equally Clearly, we must have nuclear weapons, and if the U.S. were used, which we walked the world, slaughtered and exploitation indigenous peoples and their natural resources and yet, even by some of these people as a man and Tasman Arawak Caribbean extinct we who have created holocausts around the world and even at home in Europe, even if it is matter for us, we have committed many crimes against humanity, still want, and indeed continue to do what we can trust these weapons of mass destruction, but were perennial victims can not and should not be.

What a shameful indictment of those members of the Master Race! But I doubt that they see it like that. One might have thought that if common sense, short supply among the lot apparently, applied the anxieties of whites good, once South Africa can not support the new order would accordingly and wisely to the exclusive mass STATE BOER already exists in Europe. But this is not the case because it is not even co targets in Europe, even close family friends and white will never wait on their hands and feet in how long they have used and repulsive in South Africa because in Europe would be regarded by their peers to be a white man any white or a woman who is not entitled to the privileges they had in South Africa or any other preferential treatment for this issue.

During the blacks of Europe and other non-whites are still victims of prejudice and discrimination of all kinds and particularly in Holland with this his racist government, the right wing. So let's be real racist and smell the coffee. All the empirical data show that black drawn to violence Black has been funded by the apartheid regime to leave. And it is sad that many Jews who had fled to South Africa to escape the chambers gas and widespread European anti-Semitism in Europe, where this monstrous phenomenon began, and came into its own between 1939-1945, still strut the mentality of people like this woman Boer Amalinda and they were all supporters of the Nazi cause in Europe, and wonder, as these Boers support Hitler in the world: two million Indians, and hundreds of thousands of black Africans and West Indians and others, they fight?

The wealthy minority of all people on Earth regardless of race, ethnicity, national origin, religion or location physics are white Jews of Europe, and live mostly all South Africa, where most of his fortune from diamonds. The countries of Southern Africa and in the neighboring countries of Zimbabwe are two of the world's largest diamond production, but take a look at the current poor standard of general life its native population black contrasts sharply with that of whites and South African expatriates, immigrant communities in the Caucasus as a whole, the Jews especially those living in the region, could easily be forgiven if he thinks otherwise. But I suppose in the world capital of industry Diamond in all its forms, unless the real diamonds are deleted, is it? Not in South Africa, South Africa, even the African continent, is apartheid, colonialist Israel.

Who are related to the Square Mile: the main financial center of London and the business sector the London Stock Exchange, Wall Street New York Stock Exchange Frankfurt, Germany, Paris, France, and those of other EU countries which is held exclusively in the control of non-whites and blacks, particularly Citizens and residents of Western countries, where they are of vital economic sectors, and even more with his Kith not white families living abroad in their country of origin, and the entire African continent, the direction and shooting of these very significant financial benefits while there many chains.

It will not happen, of course, partly because white Caucasian European in the world of public sentiment would never be the face and make it possible, and especially too, because all these white inmates and / or controlled the Caucasus and root binding legislation permanently to ensure that the media, directly or indirectly, their main economic resources and the preservation of security and will never be compromised by not dropping the hands and control much less effective that are considered "foreign" entities, and even when good Practical business dictates otherwise Western governments, particularly the United States and Great Britain, have stepped up quickly and arbitrarily blocked legislative so submitted, and even contractual arrangements. No niceties such quid pro quo or that merit review, however, when the boot is on the other foot country and exploited, much of Africa and black, are those currently with disdain and condescension called non-Westerners call, as Kimberley rally happening in Israel (June 25, 2010) shows.

However, if the black governments worldwide, including Africa, black and diaspora in the world who are fully conscious or, failing that seriously should make a determined effort to discover what has been done collectively to people in the past and continue to be committed against them to date by the white colonialist-imperialist mentality, regardless country or region of origin, can not pull himself together and do something constructive about the continued operation of their own, both as human a resource, then frankly they deserve all they get.

Finally, in the case of South Africa is a country corrupted by power to fill their pockets at the expense of ordinary people, which is the planet in Amalinda? Yes, Africa has more than its fair share of despots and corrupt leaders the call, but the real question is, are those who have come to power only to support Western interests and keep them there for the delivery of these despots corrupted by excessive amounts of military equipment to suppress their own people through the well tried and tested colonial practice of divide -rule, often overthrowing democratically elected governments in Africa to facilitate this objective? Patrice Lumumba of Congo and Uganda, Milton Obote, the two democratically elected leaders of their countries, are two of many such victims.

However, it could end without facing this hoax front Amalinda, citing in the process some of the many European countries with well-government advertising and corporate financial scandals and corruption cases Tested: Germany, Holland, Belgium, France, Ireland, Greece, United Kingdom (the spending scandal Members A; trial BAE financial kick-back/corruption Tony Blair and New Labour forced the courts of the United Kingdom at the end, under the pretext of national security for another dishonest, but there are countless examples) and many others. And across the pond to the United States a similar situation existed for a long time and even less on the government and levels of the company, Enron, the subprime disaster and many other examples of corporate greed easily come to mind, but there's more. Then ago Australia, Japan, Canada and U.S. states Client Indonesia, the Philippines and South Korea – could continue, but not, as I am ensure that any person perceptive mind that for now get the picture I paint double standards and hypocrisy Amalinda.

I think it's a classic case Amalinda "physician heal thyself." O "People in glass houses should not throw stones." And I have not played to customers in the Middle East near the U.S. states and the EU (which would take years to do so), where democracy does not exist and people do not even have the opportunity to vote – such as Saudi Arabia! Amalinda a tip, next time you try to argue for the import of this type please try to do with objectivity, rationality and common sense, and if they can not stop these debates to those who have the mental capacity and integrity to do so.