Archive for Politics

Obama: “After My Election I Have More Flexibility”

Obama Tells Russia “After My Election I Have More Flexibility”

 

Wow, if there was ever a line that Barack Obama wished he could take back it would probably be this one. Why would I guy who gets called a communist and a marxist on a regular basis ever risk talking to Russia of all places about how he needs to just get past the next election and then they can work closely again.

Watch the video below:

What was said?

President Obama: On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space.
President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…
President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.
President Medvedev: I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.

White House spokesman Ben Rhodes, deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, said:

“Since 2012 is an election year in both countries, with an election and leadership transition in Russia and an election in the United States, it is clearly not a year in which we are going to achieve a breakthrough. Therefore, President Obama and President Medvedev agreed that it was best to instruct our technical experts to do the work of better understanding our respective positions, providing space for continued discussions on missile defense cooperation going forward.”

As sad as the audio is to be coming from the sitting U.S. President, it does present a great campaign opportunity for Mitt Romney. As Glenn pointed out, love him or hate him, Mitt Romney is not a communist.

Mar 26, 2012 6:17am

President Obama Asks Medvedev for ‘Space’ on Missile Defense — ‘After My Election I Have More Flexibility’

SEOUL, South Korea — At the tail end of his 90 minute meeting with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev Monday, President Obama said that he would have “more flexibility” to deal with controversial issues such as missile defense, but incoming Russian President Vladimir Putin needs to give him “space.”

The exchange was picked up by microphones as reporters were let into the room for remarks by the two leaders.

The exchange:

President Obama: On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space.

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

President Medvedev: I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.

When asked to explain what President Obama meant, deputy national security adviser for strategic communications Ben Rhodes told ABC News that there is room for the U.S. and Russia to reach an accommodation, but “there is a lot of rhetoric around this issue — there always is — in both countries.

A senior administration official tells ABC News: “this is a political year in which the Russians just had an election, we’re about to have a presidential and congressional elections — this is not the kind of year in which we’re going to resolve incredibly complicated issue like this. So there’s an advantage to pulling back and letting the technical experts work on this as the president has been saying.”

-Jake Tapper

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

President Obama got caught in private conversation with a hot mic today in Seoul, South Korea, telling outgoing Russian president Dmitry Medvedev that Vladimir Putin should give him more “space” and that “after my election I have more flexibility.”

VIDEO: Obama Caught Telling Russian Leader To Wait Until After Election On Missile Defense

Ron Paul is the Only Candidate Who Will Cut Spending

Ron Paul is the Only Candidate Who Will Cut Spending

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
February 25, 2012

Ron Paul is the only candidate serious about reducing the deficit and the national debt.

This fact was recently underscored by a study released by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a bipartisan think tank.

Newt Gingrich’s tax and budget plans would add $7 trillion to the debt over the remainder of the decade and Rick Santorum would do about the same.

Mitt Romney’s tax-cut and spending proposals would keep the deficit and debt on keel.

Ron Paul would reduce spending and slowly eliminate the debt by zeroing out a host of federal agencies. He would work to bring back honest money and sane economic policies by getting rid of the Federal Reserve – a prospect opposed by both sides of the establishment political party now ruling the roost in Washington.

“I think Ben Bernanke is a student of monetary policy,” said the declared Republican front-runner Mitt Romney last year, “he’s doing as good a job as he thinks he can do…  I’m not going to spend my time going after Ben Bernanke. I’m not going to spend my time focusing on the Federal Reserve.”

Earlier this week, ABC News commentator Jonathan Karl was asked which candidate will reduce spending the most and he said Ron Paul.

He looked a bit sheepish about it but had to tell the truth despite the concerted effort by the establishment media to ignore Ron Paul.

 

Obama blames economic woes on tensions with Iran

‘Obama blames economic woes over tensions with Iran’

US President Barrack Obama has blamed rising oil prices on tensions with Iran, as America is hit with high gas prices and the government is forced to use its reserves, Press TV reports.

“Obama is trying to sweep everything under the carpet and say, well, the situation with Iran has led to such high prices,” said Nader Mokhtari, columnist and political commentator, on Friday.

Obama made the anti-Iran comments in response to Republican criticism of his energy policies, adding that demand from China, India and other emerging economies, as well as Wall Street speculation, has contributed to soaring prices at the pump.

Mokhtari added that Obama is avoiding the genuine problems within the US economy, focusing instead on his reelection campaign in the upcoming presidential elections.

“And so he’s gone back to the old technique of blaming foreign factors for his failure; but his slippery little friends in AIPAC I’m sure put him up to this and they are also hoping that keeping the market indices high just long enough for him to get through the elections to get him reelected,” Mokhtari added.

Gasoline prices have reached nine month highs, rising nearly 9 cents in the past week to an average of USD 3.61 a gallon, and are expected to rise further toward the four dollar mark.

New York’s main contract, light sweet crude for delivery in April, rose 64 cents to more than USD 180. The price of Brent crude rose USD 1.85 on Friday to settle near a 10-month high of USD 125.47 a barrel, the highest since April 29.

The hike in oil prices was triggered when Iran threatened last week to cut oil exports to six European Union states if they fail to sign long-term deals with Tehran.

On February 19, Iran’s Oil Ministry announced that it had cut oil exports to British and French firms.

On December 31, 2011, the United States imposed new sanctions against Iran, with the European Union later following suit, aimed at limiting Iran’s oil and financial sectors including its Central Bank.

“[Iran’s reaction was] unexpected and that is why Obama is going out now with a failure of his economic policy; he’s now trying to place the blame on Iran. Iran doesn’t supply the US with oil,” Mokhtari concluded.

GMA/JR

Ron Paul Beats Obama in New Iowa Poll

Ron Paul Beats Obama in New Iowa Poll

By Kurt Nimmo

As documented by Paul Joseph Watson today, candidate Ron Paul is being systematically denied caucus and primary wins by the Republican establishment.

This became obvious when Maine’s GOP chairman Charles Webster asked for a vote recount after fraud prevented Paul from winning the state. Even establishment liberal stalwart Rachel Maddow was obliged to admit the possibility.

Now comes word that a poll in the key swing state of Iowa shows Paul besting Obama over all other Republican candidates. Paul leads Obama by seven points, according to the poll conducted by the Des Moines Register.

Rick Santorum tops Obama 48 to 44 percent, while Mitt Romney leads the incumbent 46 to 44 percent. Newt Gingrich would be the only candidate to be defeated by Obama, losing by 14 points, 51 to 37 percent, reports the Houston Chronicle.

Paul is the favorite of young people from Iowa. In 2008, this demographic was in the hip pocket of Obama, who had promised “change” but delivered more of the same as he pursued George W. Bush’s wars and oversaw the economic collapse of the nation.

“In order to win back the White House Republicans must nominate a candidate who can provide stark contrast with the failings of the current administration and Ron Paul is the only candidate advocating for something other than the dismal, status quo policies,” said Paul’s campaign chair, Jesse Benton.

Ron Paul 2012 Ad Slams Santorum As “Fake”

Ron Paul Ad Slams Santorum As “Fake”

A new Ron Paul 2012 campaign ad has been released at this time that takes direct aim at GOP rival Rick Santorum’s voting record.

Entitled merely “Fake”, the 30 second spot tends to make the case that it’s a myth that Santorum is in any way a fiscal conservative.

The concise ad crams in the facts that Santorum voted to raise the federal debt ceiling 5 instances, voted to double the size with the Department of Education via No Child Left Behind, and voted for Medicare Element D – the greatest entitlement expansion considering that the ’60s.

The ad also highlights the reality that Santorum voted to send foreign aid to North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il and also endorsed sending billions in tax dollars to the corrupt regime in Egypt.

Lastly, the ad makes the point that Santorum also voted to give the abortion provider Planned Parenthood millions of dollars in funding.

“Our new ad ‘Fake’ consists of just a snippet of evidence against Rick Santorum getting a fiscal conservative, but for the reason that these examples are so damning it makes the case convincingly,” mentioned Ron Paul 2012 National Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton.

“Santorum touts his ‘conservative record’ all too usually. It is time that his real record tends to make its way into the national conversation we’re getting about which Republican presidential candidate may be the authentic, constant conservative. That man is Ron Paul.” Benton added.

The new ad is scheduled to air on broadcast and television in Michigan as part from the Ron Paul campaign’s significant ad blitz set to hit subsequent month’s ‘Super Tuesday’ states.

Ron Paul Ad – Rick Santorum a Conservative?

Alex Jones’ Predictions That Came True

Alex Jones‘ Predictions That Came True

InfoWars.com predictions

In the video below these are the Alex Jones predictions for the following subjects:

July 25th 2001 Alex predicts 911

September 28th 2005 Alex predicts Real Estate Crash

January 20th 2008 Alex predicts destruction of the dollar world currency

September 2009 Alex continues to predict the dollar crash

July 1st 2010 Alex predicts the crash of the dollar

February 11th 2008 Alex predicts the Swine Flu epidemic (H1N1)

July 21st 2011 Alex predicts Norway Shooting

June 21st 2011 Alex predicts Rick Perry to run for US President 53 days before made public

November 1st 2007 Alex released End Game (Blueprint For Global Enslavement)

Alex Jones’ Predictions that came True

New 44 Cent Stamp Celebrates a Muslim holiday

Apparently President Obama thinks that putting hearts and butterflies on the new stamp will make most people not realize that the rest is Arabic and probably not something we want to support.

New Stamp – the second one!!!

USPS New 44-Cent Stamp Celebrates a Muslim holiday

USPS New 44-Cent Stamp Celebrates a Muslim holiday.
If there is only ONE thing you share or forward today.. let it be this!

President Obama has directed the United States Postal Service to REMEMBER and HONOR the EID MUSLIM holiday season with a new commemorative 44-Cent First Class Holiday Postage Stamp.

REMEMBER to adamantly & vocally BOYCOTT this stamp, when you are purchasing your stamps at the post office.

All you have to say is “No thank you, I do not want that Muslim Stamp on my letters!”

To use this stamp would be a slap in the face to all those AMERICANS who died at the hands of those whom this stamp honors.
REMEMBER the MUSLIM bombing of Pan Am Flight 103!

REMEMBER the MUSLIM bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993!

REMEMBER the MUSLIM bombing of the Marine Barracks in Lebanon !

REMEMBER the MUSLIM bombing of the Military Barracks in Saudi Arabia !

REMEMBER the MUSLIM bombing of the American Embassies in Africa !

REMEMBER the MUSLIM bombing of the USS COLE!

REMEMBER the MUSLIM attack on 9/11/2001 !

REMEMBER all the AMERICAN lives that were lost in those vicious MUSLIM attacks!

Pass this blog post along to every Patriotic American that you know and get the word out!  Use the Facebook plugin at the bottom to share this with everyone you know.

Honor the United States of America !

The Civil War

America has been part of some devastating battles over her long history. World War I and World War II were tremendously difficult conflicts and ones that taxed the nation’s resources to the maximum. But none of those conflicts can compare to The Civil War not only for the brutality and devastation of human life but in the damage to social fabric that was caused by that terrible conflict.

America is proud that it has never had a battle on its native soil. Other than Pearl Harbor and 911, we have never even been attacked on our own soil. So it took a war of brother against brother, American against American to make even the possibility of war within the borders of America even possible.

The war’s statistics are staggering for a relatively short conflict. The war started on April 12. 1861. It was the confederacy that drew first blood attacking Fort Sumter in South Carolina. The battles of the Civil War and legendary. We have come to honor the dead of both sides of this bloody conflict by preserving many of those historic battlefields even to this day.

Throughout the war, the North was at an advantage in preparation, equipment and supplies. But General Lee, who commanded the confederate army, was a brilliant strategist and the battles often resulted in massive casualties on both sides. When the final tally was drawn up, over 970,000 American citizens died from the Civil War. While that may not compare numerically to the huge losses in the two world wars later to come, this figure represented 3% of the American population at the time. And since the huge majority of the war dead were from America’s youth, the hope for her future, the set back this war had on the development of America’s economy was truly remarkable.

In modern times we look back on the Civil War as a titanic battle to bring an end to the horrors of slavery in this country. And to be sure, the Civil War is and will forever remain a central part of black history and the beginning point of the civil rights movement in America. But the causes of the Civil War were complex and diverse which only made negotiation and resolution of the war more difficult in advance of conflict.

Part of the issue that was being fought out was the rights of states for self determination as balanced with the rights of the federal government to determine affairs in the individual states. On the surface, this may seem trivial compared to ending slavery but put in context, it was a critical relationship to iron out in light of our not very distant memory of our revolution against England for trying to impose unreasonable controls on the colonies.

American’s are fiercely independent people and that independent spirit was born in the battles of the revolutionary war where America stated firmly that they would no longer bow to a king or let the centralized government have such sweeping control over individual lives. The outrage over how England tried to put the colonies under servitude was the foal that caused the explosion known as the Revolutionary War. And much effort was made to assure there was language in the constitution and other critical documents to assure that the federal government would be severely limited from interfering in the lives of its citizens.

Beyond that the preservation of the union as one country was also in contest in the Civil War. But it was the moral issue of slavery that made the Civil War such an emotional issue and one that caused people to fight with such ferociousness to defend their side. In the end, even Abraham Lincoln made slavery the central rational for the war and determined that the end of this barbaric practice would be the legacy of this horrible conflict.

But one thing that also was a legacy of the Civil War was the determination that we, as Americans, would never turn our war machine on our own citizens again. The war tore families apart and literally caused brother to war against brother. Since reconstruction and the union of America, the country has had a bruise in its national psyche over this war and that bruise reminds us that we are one people and we would always be one people devoted to the causes of truth, justice and the American way of life.

The Boston Tea Party

There are some events that took place during the historic time when America was declaring its independence from England that are so historic, so iconic that they have taken on the status of myth and legend as much as history. And certainly the Boston Tea Party fits that description. This is such a stand out event in American history that it is common to see school children reenact it during elementary school plays or skits. And the participants names including John Hancock, Paul Revere and John Adams have similarly become classic heroic figures in American folklore and history.

But the events of December 16, 1776 were not fable or myth but real and important parts of the development of the American Revolution that was crucial to the early foundation of this country. The situation of taxation that was being imposed by Brittan on goods that were coming into the colonies was one of serious stress on the colonists because they had no control over those taxes. And that tax situation was made more extreme with the relationship between the British government and the East India Tea company who was receiving tax breaks for their goods that would place them at a competitive advantage in the Americas.

These kinds of preferential treatment only aggravated the already tense relationship between the colonies and Britain and many in leadership over the American states saw the way England was handling the situation as conspiratorial to try to hurt the economy of the growing new country and to impose restrictive rule through taxation on the colonies and the colonists. That is why that famous proclamation “No Taxation Without Representation” became one that is historic for the outrage against the English that took the colonies into revolutionary war that eventually lead to the independence of the American colonies and the beginning of a new country.

Finally on Thursday, December 16, 1776, decisive action needed to be taken. And our forefathers were nothing if not known for bold and decisive action in the fact of tyranny. The East India Tea Company had docked the HMS Dartmouth in Boston harbor full of a fresh import of tea for the colonies. It was time for the colonists to make a statement that this unethical and immoral use of taxes on tea was for all intents and purposes an act of war and they were going to treat it as such.

Badly disguised as Indians, the brave colonists boarded the HMS Dartmouth and her sister ships, the HMS Beaver and the HMS Eleanor and skillfully and efficiently dumped the entire delivery of tea into Boston harbor. All totaled, over forty five tons of tea went into the water that night. It was a stunning blow. But more than that it was a slap in the face of the British government and a gauntlet laid down that their attempts to rule the colonies b tyranny were not going to be tolerated any longer.

This event was pivotal in pushing the hostilities between England and the colonies past the “nuisance” stage and setting forces in motion for war. But more than that, it was such a bold statement of defiance that many colonists were inspired to join the increasing chorus calling for war and independence.

For loyal Britains, the idea of separating and forming their own country was hard to grasp. But the leadership of the men who planned and executed the Boston Tea Party demonstrated a new independent spirit. This was the kind of backbone, the sense of pride and independence that was to come to define the American spirit in years ahead. But it took the courage and boldness of this little band of men to demonstrate that being trod on by a foreign tyrant was not something we had to put up with.

It made a statement to England and to the colonists at the same time that revolution was possible and they really could think of themselves as free people who would bow to no king. From that time forward the independence of America was inevitable. These visionary leaders showed us an America that gave power to its people, not to kings or governments and the result in how America works and our lives are lived is the direct outcome of bold protests such as the Boston Tea Party.

The American Cowboy

Americans have a unique vision of themselves and their role in the world. Unlike perhaps any other peoples in history, Americans see themselves as people of destiny and a people who were put here to do something phenomenal and something significant for history and for all peoples of the earth. This unique self-concept, sometimes perceived as arrogance, is deeply grounded in a set of archetypes that Americans use to form their vision of themselves in the world. And no other archetype is as powerful in the American psyche than that of the cowboy.

The actual American cowboy was indeed a unique individual. While probably not as noble and ruggedly handsome as the images created of him in the movies, they were unique types of men who carved out a civilization from the rugged wilderness that was the American west in the years before the turn of the last century.

Some of the reasons that the image of the cowboy sometimes includes elements of the outlaw and the loner is that much of the legend of the cowboy came from stories of refugees from the broken southern army who took to the life of the cowboy rather than attempt to integrate into a society that included making peace with “the Yankee”. And that type of individual certainly did account for many of the outlaws who went on to become the stuff of legend and stories even to this day.

The renegade and loner image combined with the rough life of an actual cowboy whose job it was to guide those huge herds of cattle along trails such as the historic Cumberland trail where they could be sold to become the steaks, leather and other goods that were sold in rustic American stores of the time. This was a difficult life and the stories of the trail make up many history books for sure. But far more of the stories of the trail are glorifications of that lifestyle that must have been difficult indeed.

But the image of the cowboy was also something that grew larger than what the actual lifestyle of those simple but rugged men must have lived in the American west. It was an image that pulled together heroes as far flung as the Australian Gaucho cowboy, the Japanese Samurai and a knight in King Arthur’s court. It was an image of a man who demonstrated the rugged individualism that all Americans consider to be one of the central unifying traits that makes America great.

The cowboy image is one that even has its influence as high in the social strata of America that it influences the presidency. It is said that there is a tradition for any president when he first is elected and comes to Washington to begin learning this big new job. Tradition h olds that each president has as part of their early duties to sit down and watch the movie High Noon. They say that President Clinton watched it dozens of times in his early years. If this is true, it accounts for how often a new president seems to grow and change in the office and becomes his own version of the great American hero that is depicted in that movie. The American cowboy defends the virtue of the weak and helpless. He is a staunch defender of families and those in society who are trying to carve out a home in a difficult world. As such, the American cowboy fits with the “superhero” image that also appeals to the American system of justice and morality and values.

Even the star wars epic films were fundamentally grounded in the legend of the cowboy. The cowboy concept grew up from a history of our country that included the settling of a big land and the settling of a wilderness that pit the god given will and intellect of man against God’s creation. And it was the will of man that prevailed. That is why American’s admire the cowboy because he represents their own struggles for greatness, for success and to be a heroic figure at least for their families, home towns and churches. And that desire so deeply rooted in the culture of American history will always be what makes America and Americans great.

PPPPP 715