Ayodhya verdict: Ratification by parliamentary massive political violence against Indian Muslims and other minorities in India

Ayodhya verdict Parliamentary ratification of massive political violence against Indian Muslims and other minorities in India. Judgement on the site demolished in Ayodhya is beyond the scope of all thought, without measuring the level of its height and contained its own level, like a piece of mirror in the hands of all people to see the image of cleaning are in the hands of whatever nature to define its final conclusion on the understanding that first, without going into its 8,189 pages. So this case (special type) can not satisfy the majority of people around the world for its mixed character of Indian democracy, secularism, capitalism, terrorism and right-wing fundamentalism India since the day of the demolition of the Babri mosque December 6, 1992. Every day we witness scenes and the leadership role of the Sangh Parivar Rath yathra supported demolition. Many made by shaving down the structure directly and indirectly involved and paid the power at the center of almost all the time, including the reign the traitor, including Atal Bihari period vaj beneficiaries is more than eleven years. Taking in view of its complexity, I see some limited areas that contain the past and the future of the possible complications Muslim monuments, assets and properties in India. I definitely say it is acceptable to all Muslims of India. At the same time, is not acceptable to all Indian Muslims, because in India, Hindu fundamentalists carried a banner of Hindu religion in one hand in the name of the calendar politics as a parliamentary political party from abusing its political power by the powerful force of military, paramilitary and defend India against Muslims, which in turn has not been a single credible political party. While Indian Muslims are political orphans that the conditions that they feel compelled to abandon the demolition day of the Babri mosque. The practice of mixing politics with religion for political power has been abandoned in Europe, England and the United States, long-term performance 500 to 600 years of history. But these days from the date of demolition for the calculation of his mental capacity on the path to the best of the Indian state with a loss a member of their top of the religious ideology of the body in the name of nationalism today's date. During the next election, the verdict was added to the list of (no) appropriations managed to terrorize most all every year. If you are really smart enemies of Indian Muslims, then every Muslim meet their ideology and practice of good for the resumption of dharma raja against Indian Muslims and other Indian citizen. Even in this case, never agree. If all Muslims of India claim to accept their Muslim religion of Hinduism, although in this case, do not accept the transformation into its fold, provided of providing food, shelter, health, education, peace and security, all Muslims of India and other citizens India. Although never be able to India India provide free community. While Indian Muslims have not played municipalities and map of religion in the election, only 10 years, no doubt Indian Muslims reflect on their promises of peace and harmony in society india. I am sure that even then they too would never be able to join one of their promises that make people during and after the elections. In essence, these MPs backed fundamentalist Hindu political parties must be paid Recognize a political party by the Election Commission of India. If it is difficult to prevent the BJP, the VHP and RSS should be banned in the interest of peace and progress of nations. The important BJP leader, said the verdict will go to the Supreme Court, which are anti-national. That is the correct way to find the weakness of the sentence he thought the Verdict challenge before the Supreme Court, the result is expected to see his failure there in the future. Liberhan commission, which had requested the facts and incidents under his tenure and the participation of political parties and their leaders in the demolition of the Babri mosque, presented his report to the Government of India and no action was taken against the list of offenders who were convicted of the act of demolition of the disputed site, Babri Masjid. The verdict in the Ayodhya site does not require approving the act of demolition of the Babri mosque in the language of impartial justice in India, but the judicial system remains a tool at the hands of policy language of the fundamentalist Hindu right has been said, arguing that his claim on the Babri Masjid site was right and ratified by the High Court. So Indian Muslims, like other peoples in the sense of religion has three types of people. In them is a genus belonging requiring more extreme Islamic form of the solution to this verdict, for the construction of the Babri mosque in the same place as we have built and still exists as a mosque until date of installation of Mr. fraudulent (SRI) idols of RAM into ruin in 1949. The second category of the Muslim population is commitment to others by the sake of peace, of harmony in Indian society and see the development of the state, the Muslim community and also in one and the same spirit as others in society india. In other words, could be called moderate Muslim group. The third is the whole class poor and the oppressed in the Muslim community has always dedicated revenue sources day only. Lack the capacity to take on unemployed. These people have little knowledge of interest and the scope of the themes of the questions depends on education Islamic imams in mosques for Friday sermons in India in particular. The Supreme Court decision, the majority of the Muslim population that is captured on quite satisfied and I can say that most Muslims saw the day of the trial proceeded without incidents against Muslims anywhere in India. The spirit in the analysis of nature, the verdict is considered more satisfactory agreements on peace and security that the content of the sentence. This means that Muslims are here they are protected against adverse events against them in three ways. The provision of direct supervision, safety measures, the minister Interior, Sri. P Chidambaram, has certainly made many people feel this kind of precautions have been taken, if the Minister of Interior and the government. narsimharao Pv structure Babri mosque can only be brought by the parliamentary political criminals crowds on 6 December 1992. The response of the government of India on the verdict also very calculated move by selected leaders in the reaction and seemed to reflect his spirit its commitment to maintain peace in society and control over-reaction "Far right" that gave the name Saffron terrorism. Everyone should congratulate the Minister of Interior, for his commitment to his work as minister Interior. But the question in my mind is alert at the national level, for every hour of Indian society and politics necessary in the coming days. What when there is no Minister of the Interior to protect Muslims in the future? Is this regulation Babri Masjid (including the way out of the court) final agreement with Muslims Indians by Hindu extremists on the right without going further in the history of Muslim invasions again after Mohammad Bin Qasim? Do you really give the anti-Muslim political power and the massacre of Muslims of all political power and mass violence against Muslims competitive business areas in many parts of India? These forces to renounce his claim on the assets of thousands of Muslims in India? How the Muslim community do not accept this verdict in the future is a topic currently in the minds of many Muslims in India, while the deposition a petition to the Supreme Court to protect future generations of Indian Muslims. The Muslim community divided into three categories that most people accepted the verdict as a matter of peace and security of the Muslim community only. And the method stationery, the Board of three members of the club is very tactical and logic in the implementation of the conclusions of each point on these issues. It is very easy to understand Chief Judge relies on a very extreme for ram janma Bhoomi that the existing site just below the central part of the mosque. All the facts behind their verdict could not understand that after going through the text of 2666 Supreme Court paged. DV Sharma, completely. It is understood that tactic, he chose his opinion very much to the opinion of another justice, justice and AU.Khan Agarwal. On the side, face justice, "Khan said exactly opposite views and demands of the Court Supreme. Therefore, Justice Agarwal who has taken the task of coordinating, as it appears that the extreme versions are moderate claims and negotiate to reach points where the possible outcome could go nice versions before reducing it by writing to the issuance of the decree that 5238 pages, September 30, 2010. Without doubt this is the historic day in the history of relations of Indian Muslims from the date of the demolition of the Babri mosque, and that the demolition was intentional, preparation, and got the history of secularism and democracy. King Baber was not demolished or destroyed RAM Mandir is not a question. Because it was the period belonged to the medieval history India, where many acts of cruelty took place in the streets of Delhi. King cruelty and killing of the Muslim population by the Muslim kings have been more cruel than Hindu kings against themselves during their period. Some thousands of Muslims were killed by Muslim kings in the history of the West Indies Age. An example of the cruelty of King Muslim is enough to what was the rule at that time the kings against the other kings, regardless of religions in India. A king, who was taken by the emperor and placed in an unobstructed view of people in a stadium as a public place, and ordered his men to cut his body into pieces. He ordered their men to get a bag of rice, and asked his men to mix the meat with the rice with spices, salt, cooking oil and pasta in the public view points to the meat and the rice was well cooked in its direct control. Then he asked his men to take the donkeys in the square and asked to see everything that went on donkeys and saw the whole scene until the end of the substance below is convinced that his revenge was enough for murder. Is this a story of cruelty against the king of Hindu Muslim kings and their people? In the verdict, the judge, Dharam Veer Sharma said that the statement of place of birth, is exactly where the sets were the idols of ram installed at night in mid-1949 and the temporary structure was on the day of December 6, 1992, simply because he wanted "no" to remove These idols of any other nature of faith and believe that the faith of people in the place where the installation was not and should not be violated more. The location of the ram installation of idols was the first, he decided then and UPS took the report to support your request. The proof of the existing structure under the proposed structure, and has shown that it is not enough to believe that Ram was born there arose only. These two fundamental issues also lead the mind to think as a result of him when the Lord is born there really a human being, etc, what is the exact date of birth in the timeline of the history of India, as regards the book Rig Veda refers have not found a reference, the born and the exact state of the realm of archaeological discoveries, does it really came in the exact place the central square of the Babri mosque. The process of reviewing the evidence and the testimony of the sample being totally violated and harpooned the commitment has been fixed and was ready to submit the account with supporting documents in the case unfair. The period, which was created as a parameter to consider and decide the case is apparently much talk of their version Measurement contradictory evidence in both cases in the entire statement. The construction model of Babri mosque, when taken into account for testing terms the same period of time, the nature of the rule, the rule of law all of them could be considered admissible as evidence in support of the central part of the sentence. The principles Islam in the construction of the Babri mosque, if taken into account, the rule of law in this period of the property as a property instead of people with this site. If Babri Mosque was the construction or renovation of the temple of RAM, by the king, Baber, his property was the site of his kingdom and the law has been in general that could plunder property, gold, ornaments, temples, villages, forts, fortresses, women, queens, ladies, and all things that might attract the attention of the monarchs. The language, which is now used mainly in the sections that Hindu fundamentalists Baber was invading and plundering the temples of India, killed and raped many women in India only because it is the rule of law in society. Might makes right. King was fittest survive. The weak were lost. The law of the jungle was the law of the land. In the same way that the monarch, Emperor Babur demolished the Ram temple in some 1527. Anyone who has renewed the Mandir, as a mosque, or something. But the question the principles of Islam in the construction of the mosque, who are attracted to the jurisdiction of the Honorable High Court, the rule of law in force at that time also taken into account while writing their intention to reduce the verdict. How can you dismiss the Indian model of the construction of a mosque in India is also another issue to raise other issues in India. Indian Muslims are and have probably been converted to Islam in many respects. The mosque was first built by Hindu Raja in South India in the state. And the way to win the territories of small kingdoms in India king's heroic duty and have done their duty. Muslims never come back and begging and search for livestock in other parts of the world, as the Aryans. Muslims will never come to live by begging profession in India. Islam is undoubtedly came from the Arab parties and built many forts contributed significantly to the whole system of Indian society, especially in terms of equality social and rule of law in Indian Manu dharma equal discriminatory, so that all of society who worship idols untouchability, as drawn by the Equality Act and the rule. Many people still speak volumes of Arya Samaj of idol worshipers, and society never taught the worship of idols Rig Veda. The most Hindus do not believe in killing Muslims, but history has little young poor and violence against Muslims in sufficient quantities to India's far right. The Hindu real, as true Muslims do not like to kill Muslims in any way. The attacks in mind that all the perpetrators are the extreme views on religion in the face. Thus, in the recent incidents of the IWC adopted the extremists of the Hindu religion. If the date, construction and principles of Islam in the construction model of the mosque, dargahs, shipyards are serious prayer and sanctuaries of India, is admissible as evidence to prove the title of properties in India, is easy to make the Red Fort, Ajmer (dargah), and also faces Hazrath Nizamuddin presentation anyway worldwide in the coming days. Not surprisingly, that restriction and allow such requests on the title in such courts. The setting time to allow and to deny the request for continuation title at the site of the Babri mosque does not follow the same route of entry of the box. When the installation ceremony of the idols inside the mosque is accepted, then has become essential to eliminate these idols from there for the condemnation of the act is guilty verdict. If the claim of the Sunni Central Board, is dismissed by the time constraint, how does the model construction of the mosque, are eligible for the verdict to divide the page into three parts. The distribution of land into three parts, if the justification, according to the verdict, the evidence and the evidence seems insufficient to give that power to make the verdict invalid. The verdict is not a matter of only mosque site, but it is a concern that the decision was based. It's just to give a new form of fundamentalist Hindus parliamentary political parties to follow the path of mass violence and constant threat in the hearts and minds Muslim population in India, on average, continue to the level of the fifth and last religious Hindu India, in addition to the system four times as varn Chatur social system of political administration of the State in India. It is also very easy to criticize people and organizations working in this legal battle, but all who are now responding in the sentence did not even know the date of the declaration of the sentence last month. Agencies and political parties such as All India Muslim Personnel Board, the Central Board Sunni imam of Jama Masjid, New Delhi, asaduddin Ovaisy, MIM, Hyderabad, the front people in southern India, and other distinguished lawyers, I hope to take the necessary measures to find the most eminent lawyers Documents proven in the case nationally, to practice in the payment of deposit base fixed term and defend the cause before the Supreme Court of Justice, in consultation with others in the filing of the petition. This means that it is my opinion as to minimize the efforts and contributions to present and discuss the case before the High Court. But Muslims, I can say, using more force against each other The items and enemies of Muslims. I am sure that if a Muslim contributes Rs.5 / to the Commission on Muslim personal law to receive 75 million rupees. This is is an important task for Indian Muslims collectively if they decide to commit (as a work of qaum) contribute to the task Strong and succeed in the future Supreme Court against Case (conspired) in which justice was a member khan to give a color of democracy as a box with the law of the jungle average age of the rule of law. Another thing is to think that religion has nothing to do with the system of social production and non-productive forces in society based on classes. and classification of population on the basis of contributions is not enough because mind and heart of these determines the change of the social and societal conditions in the actual conditions of Marxist philosophy. The faith in religion is personal, when it comes out on the streets as crowds at the specific task of getting the power to those who led people really belonged to sections and proletarian feudal and capitalist society and that India will continue to exist as one, but never change from one to the other at all times. If the interpretation Marxism, as a flexible tool to accommodate the Muslim masses in it according to Indian society, it is optional for Muslims to adopt and support the communist parties, Indian Muslims will never feel alone in the hands of the extremist right of Indian society, which has the history and practice of relationships between brothers and sisters, as in India. Heroes and heroism is never force against the weak, but it is the true spirit of justice of the few against the power of the majority. Mohammed Ayub

Riverside – Driven To Destruction “Anno Domini High Definition Tour 2009″

Progressive Politics in the Global Age $92.99 Progressive politics has been concerned with rolling back prejudices, improving democratic accountabilities, and promoting the common good for over a century…